Daniel Craig will make a great James Bond, He'll be a more grittier Bond, something I think this franchise needs. It's always good to have a change, Emagine where the franchise would be if it was the same actor playing James Bond in all 20 movies, it probably wouldn't make it to 20 movies.
» up

Hello everyone, I´m an argentine fan of James Bond movies and I totally disagree with that Casino Royale´s boicot web site. I just don't quite follow those fellas, I mean, they hadn´t even seen Craig´s performance yet. They´re just misjudging him as well. Daniel Craig is a good actor and we must give him at least one chance. He doesn´t deserve that bad treatment.
» up

Daniel is going to bring a real physical side back to James Bond, he is handsome and sexy in a tough-looking manner but has that very commanding Englishness ;o) What a great actor to choose, what a bold decision. I have great respect for the producers now. I look foreward to seeing DC holstered up with a stiff drink :o)
» up

Grow up people. Craig is our james bond. You might not like the senario but GET OVER IT. Sure you can stop loving james bond movies, but don't him down before he can show what he's worth. I'm pleased with the producers desicion(one of there better one's) and i think CASINO ROYALE is going to top the Brosnon's(not hard to top DAD). Fleming's bond is back.
» up

Craig is the best Craig is the best Craig is the best Craig is the best Craig is the best Craig is the best Craig is the best Craig is the best
» up

Craig is a terrific actor and I am sure he will be just fine as Bond. All the naysayers to the contary. What does it matter what this group of one or two thinks
» up

Hi !!.. I'm sure Daniel Craig will be a great Bond,- After films acting as Layer cake, Road to perdition and Munich- I,for one, have never doubted it. Craig takes to us for Bond & Fleming's essentials !! and, we must draw a lesson from our past failures- OHMSS and T.Dalton's Films are the nearest examples- Bond is more than a pretty face suited in a tuxedo.. Thanks God Suave agent is over! By way of conclusion, Bad Criticism of film before CR premiere is stupid...so, this arguments doesn't "hold water" , -wrong way- ! To my mind, Craig is one of the best chap for the job. Finally, I'm spanish and a partner of a James bond spanish forum called "www.gritos.com" and I'd glad to everybody to express whatever you want about JB in it !. Thanks everybody and good luck!
» up

if you get hot in a movie like munich and these becouse an actour you never saw bevor, than you can be sure, daniel craig will be the right choise!!! ladies we looking forward to a yummy james bond.
» up

What are you blathering on about,Connery is gone,time passes.What has that got to do with the price of fish?A lot of Bond fans can't bear the thought of Craig as 007.Deal with it.
» up

From what I've seen, Daniel Craig is a good actor and is just what the franchise needs. And after seing those photos on the beach.... Man, the dude is real hot!!! hehehe
» up

I would just like to express my full support and excitment for Daniel Craig as James Bond, and I have a message to all the childish Craig boycotters. Pierce Brosnan's time is over! I, along with alot of Bond fans out there, am sick of a pretty-boy as James Bond! I couldn't be happier with the choice! Wilson and Broccoli made the best choice possible with Craig. He will be a better Bond than Brosnan ever was!
» up

i think craig wont be sush a bad bond, he will be a suprise to all his 'haters', succes to him!
» up

I have loved Sea Connery to bits, I was happy with Pierce Brosnan, and I can hardly wait to see Mr. Craig in Casino Royal. I think he fits in perfectly, he is a great actor. Im sure he will be a great succes.How can anybody say otherwise, bevor one has seen the movie. All these sour-pussies dont HAVE to watch it, they can watch Rosamunde Pilcher...but I and my friends, we certainly will and we look forward to.
» up

Hello. I am a Web-master of a forum about James Bond in Spain. (In Spanish, of course). In our web people wants to give an oportunity to Craig. ( www.gritos.com/007 ) We want watch the film before bad opinions. Good Luck Craig Good Luck Bond Excuse me about my English ;-))
» up

Aah, Friday October 14th 2005 - what a day, eh? I waited with baited breath to learn who would don the walther PPK and bring 007 back from the brink of overblown silliness and invisible cars. Secretly hoping that when this secret agent was unveiled, it would all just be a cruel marketing trick and Pierce Brosnan would indeed carry on the role. But, as that day played out - that was not to be the case. I too, like most fans was a little upset by the news that Mr Craig was to be our new man and scoffed at the idea that he would even fulfill the usual 3 picture criteria. “Bring back Brosnan” I cried for months, but Eon had made their choice. But, lo and behold, here I am only 4 months later - and I have to say, I totally agree with them! This is going to be a new kind of Bond movie with an excellent actor in the leading role. Craig may not exactly look the part in the perceived image of Bond, but I’m ready to give him a go and I for one cannot wait for November to roll around. This website “craignotbond” seems a silly and fruitless exercise and I for one, don’t want to knock this guy before he’s started. Granted, I wish Brosnan was still in the driving seat, but he’s not and I for one applaud Eon for going a completely different route with this. Just look at Craig in his previous movies and you will discover a sensitive actor with an exceptionally wide range. I’m sure he can nail Bond, if we just give him a chance. I have loved Bond since I was a kid (Tim Dalton was my first introduction) and have since enjoyed all interpretations of the character. Its time for us to just get used to another one . . . and I can’t wait.
» up

In the beginning of the whole discussion and debate about who's an adequate successor had I the same opinion of most of the real bond fans. I found Daniel Craig, god forget me saying this, but an totally gun-shoe. Now, after a while, I got the impression that Daniel Craig isn't as bad as all saying. He's a real turn-out and mostly a perfect actor to follow the line of the James Bond identity. At least, why shouldn't have James Bond also blonde hair? It's not hair-thing, it ought to be more a gentlemen-playboy-thing. Isn't it? Kind regard. D.R.-E.E. Nightfox
» up

Peeps, just be glad the producers had the balls to pick someone who's not so obvious and slick. The flamboyant Moore/Brosnan-type Bond wouldn't last five minutes in the field. They're unbelievable. Go back to Fleming's novels and learn what kind of a guy Bond is. Craig is the right man, his face shows character. Him not having the right looks is just bollocks. It's all a matter of cinema: If they can make Tom Cruise look hetero, they surely can make Dannyboy look good!
» up

They should censor the anti-Craig Web. What ever it is they should except or get lost. I Favor Daniel Craig for the Role. After Casino Royale release I hope he does five more Bond movies. He be the Best Bond
» up

Accept a change, folks. Craig is a good choice, but people seem to have problems accepting changes. Sure enough, Connery was a great Bond, Moore did it is way (elegant too), Brosnan was good but getting a bit tiresome towards the end. In comes Craig. What's wrong with change? Give him a chance. And let's be honest; if any other star had injured himself during shooting, people would have said "wow, doesn't he have courage to make the stunt himself". So - wait and see, BOND will be back with a whole new look and you'll like it.
» up

I like the idea. Bond is getting a new look, and change can be a good thing. Daniel Craig is a really good actor. As said on this website, his role in Munich proves he is the right man for the job. He also did a good job in Layer Cake. I say at least give the movie a chance, for those of you who still can't deal with the fact that Sean Connery is long gone, then just stick with the older movies. As for the rest of us, we will be enjoying the Bond franchise.
» up

I'm a long time Bond fan and post regularly at Bond related forums. I'm sick of the bashers, who are arrogant enough to judge without seeing the film. I have accepted he's going to be different than any Bond before... But I think that's just what the franchise needs after the disaster of Die Another Day. Craig will portray 007 in his own fashion, but (from recent "paparazzi" snaps) I pick it'll be a cross between Dalton (casual dresser and rougher than others) and Connery (very cool attitude)! I'm excited to see how well he does. Finally... I don't give a toss what the critics think or what the Craig-bashers have to say... I've made my own mind up - to have an open mind and go in expecting the very best Craig, EON, and Fleming can offer!
» up

Daniel Craig is a very good actor. I think that by looking at his choices of roles that he must have really seen something special in Casino Royale that made him want to do it. He is a good choice to play a great character. Anyone who wants to boycott can go right ahead. A hunch tells me that there won't be many of them and that the ones who do will be missing out. More room in the theater for the real fans.
» up

My on-line bulletin is about Cine History. Daniel is an interesting choice for James Bond. Lock this world wide reaction -in both side: yes and not-around the world. Somebody remember similar actions for Timothy or Pierce? Bond is Craig.
» up

i know this sounds awfully shallow, but i saw those pics of daniel on the beach and... WOW!!! this is one 007 film I'll be happy to go see! He's simply beautiful and waaay sexier than that boring and sickly brosnan guy. james bond definitely has a new fan here.
» up

I don't know much about Daniel work before MUNICH. But after see his portrait as STEVE my opinion is clear and simple: he is a great actor, and a great choice for a Secret Agent character. The "Real Spies" are men like Daniel, with comun faces, not pretty boys image. Somebody remember Kim Philby?, the most famous european spy in the 20 century. I am editor in chief for an on-line bulletin. We tell in our next issue about:craig is bond.net
» up