Cannot wait for this film! Craig is indeed Bond. Looking good! :-]
» up

I'm 23, and the Bond that's dominated the Bond film world has been Pierce Brosnan for the last several years. I've seen some of the old Bond films with Connery and Moore, and I happened to like Brosnan too. I'm just excited a new Bond film is coming out, so I figure we should give Daniel Craig a chance. From what I see on the trailers, he looks like he'll do a nice job at it.
» up

Hi guys! I have set up a site in support of craig! http://www.freewebs.com/craigisbond/
» up

I sent a E-mail to The CraigNotBond people and Sony with my comments. If you haven I really push and urgh you to! Tommy
» up

I just sent the following email to danielcraigisnotbond.com following listening to that hilarious clip on You Tube... The clock is ticking to the 16th November, Enjoy the read: Dear craig not bond people, I am an Englishman, university educated and well read. I do not drink Bollinger for breakfast, nor take part in fox hunts, polo matches, nor attend society events. Just a working class boy from Sussex, made good. I now live in Somerset, and work in IT. I have held my tongue on your treatment of Daniel Craig up till now, but now I have seen fit to break my silence. I have just heard this snippet of the interview with Deanna, which I found on You Tube. What I heard, edited though it was, made me rather angry. Deanna Brayton is not even a James Bond fan! This makes all your arguments about the choice of Daniel Craig in the role of James Bond completely null and void. If your such a fan of Pierce Brosnan, then why not watch some of his other offerings: The Lawnmower Man - utter tosh if you ask me Death Train - derivative and a rip off of so many other action films The Fourth Protocol - I love the book, and this was OK. The Thomas Crown Affair - brilliant, infact better than the original I could go on. Brosnan's portrayal, although very suave and sophisticated was so laden with cheesey one liners and hampered by poor CGI at the end; that any decent, layered characterisation was overshadowed by the gimmicks. Invisible cars and laser watches do not make a secret agent. GoldenEye and The World is not Enough were exceptional, and up there with the best, but Tomorrow Never Dies and Die Another Day are up there with A View to a Kill and Moonraker for sheer shoddiness, poor script, direction and laboured performances. Brosnan is now I believe 53 years of age? (Please correct me if I am wrong). This is too old to play James Bond. I am 30, and he is old enough to be my father. I'd expect him to get a hernia if he performs another stunt. Daniel Craig is the right choice for this role. He is not ugly (no, I don't fancy him as I am straight), he is an accomplished, well trained and exceptional actor, with extremely high film, tv and stage credentials (way better than any of his predecessors, bar Dalton and Connery). He has the right ruthless and dangerous edge to him (No, I do not work for EON). And whether you like it or not, he is James Bond in 2006 and for the forseeable future. No boycott or petty hate campaign can change that fact. Come November 16th, that horse you sit so high on will throw you off. Enjoy Casino Royale, I know I will. Regards, Daniel Billing...a James Bond fan.
» up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMmT2QU7FTo
» up

It's fun to see, in this last stretch, the shabby house Deanna built--with her ridiculous web site--crumbling all around her. Just like the house in the trailer. The Glory Days are back again thanks to the vision, guts and class of all involved in the making of CR. In 40 years the franchise has knocked Bond films out of the park less than a half-dozen times by my count. Thank God, here's one more. And, not to be indelicate, but judging from the photos of Mr. Craig in his swimsuit, DB has clearly bitten off more than she can chew.
» up

As the people on the message board of 'Bond 22' already have said and noticed, miss Deanna Brayton is indeed a total moron for creating a site called danielcraigisnotbond.com. I mean, she must be absolutely out of her mind saying that, making sure the whole James Bond fandom trips over her dirty lies. Because her dirty lies pile up like a bunch of shit. And with all respect, saying someone has a low IQ does say a lot about the person who wrote it's IQ. In this case, Deanna Brayton's IQ. And in what way is a spelling error connected to a high or low IQ? Tests have showed I have quite an IQ, but since I am not a native-English speaker, my spelling errors when writing in English are countless. What in fact is the use of Deanna Brayton's site? To me, it's all reversed psychology, saying someone must absolutely don't do something, to make sure they do. Only Deanna Brayton does not seem to understand that her site causes a reaction similar to the reversed psychology reactions. So, Deanna Brayton, if you read this, please answer my e-mail and then go and watch Casino Royale on it's release date. Then, and only then, will I listen seriously to your comments on Daniel Craig. Mystery.anonymous.
» up

Today I watched the trailer for the new James Bond movie and I also saw a Making of, and now I know: Daniel Craig IS the new James Bond alright! He will be smarter than Pierce Brosnan!
» up

Regards from BARCELONA. Again, my absolute support to Mr. Craig. For those people who do not support him in this rome as James Bond, I recomend them to watch a film: layer cake. He is superb actor. It's time to show James Bond as a man with a licence to kill, not an elegant womaniser.
» up

Daniel Craig will be the best 007 in the Bond history thus making Connery fade away from our collective minds as James Bond....Daniel looks bad ass and he is what is needed as the new modern and dark Bond to make the hero trully beleviebale in the post 9/11 days....Daniel Craig is Bond at his best! I do not care what others may think, he lacks but this Bond does look suave and fit for the part...If Ian Fleming was still among us, he would have green lighted Craig as Bond instead of Roger or Sean!Casino Royale will be the greatest Bond thrill ride yet...See you all,November 17!Cheers Daniel and hats off!
» up

Give this guy a chance!! He looks like a good actor so he needs support for taking on the role playing James Bond after the old one decided not to do any more James Bond films. I'm am looking forward to see the new James Bond movie Casino Royale!
» up

i've just posted an article to "Trailer Trash" in support of Daniel Craig. Check it out.
» up

Bravo, Ripple. How fitting it is her last name starts with Bray. She and her crew, The Braytonites, have been around for centuries, trashing all artists who dare buck the grain. They jeered at Da Vinci. They spat on Van Gogh. They stoned Dylan for going electric. And they didn't like Elvis much either. Picasso was thinking about her when he painted a girl with a block for a head. Hats off to everyone who ain't afraid of the big change comin' in November.
» up

For some reason I had imagined Deanna Brayton to be a young, misguided fan who would hopefully cast off her adolescent lust for Pierce Brosnan and finally grow up. However, upon hearing her voice I now realise she is more like Annie Wilkes, the fat, middle-aged, crazed No 1 fan from Stephen King's "Misery". There is no hope for this psycho bitch. Roll on "Casino Royale" - can't wait to see it!
» up

Regards from BARCELONA, SPAIN. I'm absulute sure Mr. Craig will be a perfect James Bond, he's an excellent actor, and I don't understand these critics before watch the film. My absolute support to him. Marta
» up

The latest contribute I've posted, is a mail to the webmaster of craigisNOTbond.com, not the one of this website. It's a mail where I bescribe that they overreacts a little bit.
» up

SHAME YOURSELFS! You already made out for yourselfs that Craig is not a good Bond. How could you know? The film is not even released! I know, I had my thoughts about Craig in the beginning, but since the second trailer was published on the net, my no-feelings were gone. Because, be honest - and I think your smart enough- the latest movies sucked bigtime (no commentary on Brosnan, he played him well), but the they went way over the top. Bond became a parody of himself. Now, with Casino Royale, the filmmakers took a turn of 360 degrees and made Bond look more realistic, rough and cool than he has ever been. My opinion and advice: wait until 17 nov before crying out loud. Greetings, Mathias
» up

Several weeks ago I saw the second trailer. And suprise, suprise...I think the Bond-franchise will finally get the positive turn with this movie. 'Cause, honest: the latest movie was really down below...I'm a Bond-fan since I was a kid (what is actually not that long ago), but I don't care about the changes the producers did with the movie. Craig is a fantastic actor, with the right kind of attitude the new, more brutal Bond needs. Bond WILL return!
» up

It just depends on who you think James Bond is as a character. Fleming's Bond was a dark haired man, but in reality, he would be in his mid 80's now, or even dead! In order to maintain a realisitic outlook for the franchise a younger man was needed. Brosnan is almost as old as Moore was when he finished with Bond, and we know what consequences that had. Bond shouldn't be drawing his pension on screen. That said, continuity is important, but it shouldn't be the be all and end all. As a Doctor Who fan, continuity is thrown out the window all the time, much to some peoples disgust. The actor for Bond should be the best man available. If people like Clive Owen or Ewan McGregor dont want to play him, then thats their choice, not the no-hopers at Craignotbond. (McGregor is blond btw). Long live JB and all who play him!
» up

A 007 rebirth is actually something the series could use. As great as the movies are, it's hard to have continuity when Bond is always 40-ish while Q went from being in his 50s into his 80's :-) And all the Craig nay-sayers who harp on the fact that he's blonde: look at Roger Moore! His hair wasn't that black sheen that Tim Dalton, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan and George Lazenby had, and he played 007 longer than anyone else!
» up

The headmistress at the psycho Web site has gone completely bonkers. Be careful, boys and girls, she's after every one of you who post on pro-Craig sites. The unfortunate wallflower's fave weapons are these: 1) The stylistic rap on the knuckles: grammatical slip-ups and spelling mistakes. (In one hysterical rant, DB misspells "unfortunately" and fails to hyphenate 'so-called'. 2) The false accusation: I was charged with having "potty mouth" although I'd kept things clean. 3) The superior sneer: I have the IQ of a "gumball" because, among other things, I referred to the FIFTY acting credits Craig had won before starting as Bond. DB's retort? "Didn't know he had any. Where?" It's easily proven, just look on the Web. 4) The outright lie...Well, every word she utters--including 'and' and 'the' --is a lie. Here's a proposal for Kitn: Quit trashing Craig's appearance and post your photo on the Web. The laughter and giggles will echo for years.
» up

I wish you could actually see Daniel Craig's body in this movie and not just hear his voice b/c he looks smokin' in this new Bond flick.
» up

I have been watching the trailer for the past few days. Craig's performance is spectacluar; he's not just throwing out quips - the guy can act! This casting choice hit the nail on the head. We have a winner.
» up

Fantastic new trailer. Looks so colourful, visceral and based in reality. DC looks brilliant!
» up